Ethereum Researchers Step Down from EigenLayer Roles Amid Conflict of Interest Concerns

ethereum, digital currency, cryptography-7107978.jpg

Editorial Board03/11/2024

Key Points

  • Resignation of Ethereum Researchers: Ethereum Foundation researchers Justin Drake and Dankrad Feist resigned from advisory roles at EigenLayer due to concerns over potential conflicts of interest.
  • Token Allocations Sparked Controversy: Both researchers had accepted EIGEN tokens as part of their compensation for advising EigenLayer, leading to mixed reactions within the Ethereum community regarding impartiality.
  • Impact on Ethereum Community: The advisory roles raised questions on influence and neutrality in the Ethereum Foundation, which funds projects within the ecosystem.
  • Researchers’ Public Apologies: Feist and Drake publicly apologized, acknowledging the controversy and expressing regret for any discord caused. Drake also committed to abstaining from future advisory roles or investments to reinforce neutrality.
  • Ethereum Foundation’s Influence and Evolving Standards: The situation highlights the importance of transparency in the Foundation’s approach and the evolving standards on conflict of interest in the crypto industry.

In a recent development in the Ethereum community, prominent researchers Justin Drake and Dankrad Feist from the Ethereum Foundation have stepped down from their advisory roles at EigenLayer. Their exit follows a controversy that erupted in May when both researchers revealed they had accepted significant token allocations from EigenLayer, sparking concerns over potential conflicts of interest.

EigenLayer is a rising star in the cryptocurrency world, known for its unique approach called “restaking,” which allows projects to leverage Ethereum’s security for other applications. As key figures at the Ethereum Foundation, a non-profit responsible for advancing Ethereum (ETH), Drake and Feist’s involvement in EigenLayer fueled debate about boundaries and neutrality within the ecosystem.

The advisory roles, which included allocations of EIGEN tokens as compensation for their guidance, revealed contrasting perspectives within the Ethereum community regarding potential conflicts of interest. Some members were concerned that the token incentives could influence Ethereum’s development roadmap and question the neutrality expected from Ethereum Foundation researchers.

On Saturday, both researchers made public announcements on X (formerly Twitter) explaining their decisions to resign. Feist shared that while his role was “negotiated in good faith to align EigenLayer with Ethereum,” he acknowledged the perception of a conflict was challenging for some within the community. Drake also issued an apology to the Ethereum community and colleagues, expressing regret for any discord his advisory role might have caused. He disclosed that his advisorship had ended in September, and no EIGEN tokens vested during his involvement.

In addition to resigning, Drake committed to a personal policy barring any future advisory roles, investments, or participation on security councils. This move goes beyond the Ethereum Foundation’s updated conflict of interest policy, signifying Drake’s intent to uphold a commitment to neutrality within the Ethereum ecosystem.

The Ethereum Foundation’s role in awarding grants and supporting projects building on Ethereum’s infrastructure adds a layer of sensitivity to any external roles taken by its key figures. With this recent development, the foundation and its researchers are likely to continue refining boundaries and transparency within the industry, setting new standards for neutrality and conflict management in the evolving world of decentralized finance.

Comments (0)

Loading...

Top Exchanges


  • 1
    Crypto Com LogoStart Trading

    Trading cryptocurrencies involves significant risk and users should carefully consider their investment objectives and risk tolerance.

  • 2
    Binance Logo 3Start Trading

    Cryptocurrency trading carries a high level of risk and users should carefully evaluate their financial situation and risk tolerance before participating.

  • 3
    Coinbase LoigoStart Trading

    Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment and you should not expect to be protected if something goes wrong.

  • 4
    Kraken LogoStart Trading

    Trading cryptocurrencies involves high risk and users should thoroughly evaluate their financial circumstances and risk tolerance.

  • 5
    Gemini LogoStart Trading

    Cryptocurrency trading involves substantial risk and users should carefully assess their investment goals and risk tolerance before participating.

  • 6
    Bitstamp LogoStart Trading

    Trading cryptocurrencies carries inherent risks and users should carefully consider their investment objectives and risk tolerance.

  • 7
    KuCoin LogoStart Trading

    Cryptocurrency trading involves significant risk and users should evaluate their financial situation and risk tolerance before participating.

  • 8
    Uphold LogoStart Trading

    Trading cryptocurrencies carries inherent risks and users should carefully assess their investment objectives and risk tolerance before engaging.